Don't use it with people, and be cautious with buildings. So its best use case is to enlarge heavily cropped distant wildlife images. It's now better in those areas, but still not very good. It works well for things like feathers, fur and foliage, but the details looked obviously fake for people and buildings. For more than that, GAI is basically inventing fake details that look plausible, but are nevertheless invented. I've found that GAI offers no advantage over bicubic for 2x uprezing. So the question is, can one of them do the job of both? The reverse can be done too by first enlarge with Gigapixel AI and then shrink the result with resampling for a sharpen effect. How does the result compare with Gigapixel AI? So, if you are interested in large prints and you have a low. Another Before/After Review image given below. So, we can clearly declare it as a clear winner. ![]() AI Gigapixel does a very good job when compared to Photoshop. I'm trying to evaluate whether one of them can be used for selected pictures.įor those of you using both, doesn't Sharpen AI do the job of Gigapixel AI?įirst, enlarge the picture using some conventional method like bicubic - and then apply Sharpen AI on top. Here, I have upscaled the same image to same resolution (2526 x 1680) using Topaz AI Gigapixel and Photoshop.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |